linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090922090248.GA7755@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:02:48 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses


* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200
> 
> > 
> > based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets 
> > x86 stay with regular allocations.
> > 
> > While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around, 
> > I see no other way to please both sides.
> 
> If you guys want to maintain two implementations of the same thing, 
> that's fine with me :)

I take this as an acked-by :-)

I'll reshape these patches on top of the counters -> events rename.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/