[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-4f95aa6518ca8ae46d88be9abb8e5a33b54812e0@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:21:37 GMT
From: tip-bot for Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, sachinp@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, markus.t.metzger@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change
Commit-ID: 4f95aa6518ca8ae46d88be9abb8e5a33b54812e0
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4f95aa6518ca8ae46d88be9abb8e5a33b54812e0
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:44:32 +1000
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:17:24 +0200
perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change
Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the
build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant:
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart':
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer
This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the
new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow().
[ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> ]
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@...ngo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 +--
arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 7ceefaf..5ccf9bc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
*/
if (record) {
struct perf_sample_data data = {
- .regs = regs,
.addr = 0,
.period = counter->hw.last_period,
};
@@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr);
- if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) {
+ if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) {
/*
* Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them
* by setting the counter to 0, so it will be
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 09de403..b1265ce 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
regs = args->regs;
- data.regs = regs;
data.addr = 0;
cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
@@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx))
continue;
- if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
+ if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs))
sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists