linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_counter/powerpc: Fix compilation after perf_counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090921073043.GB24467@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:30:43 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
	"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter/powerpc: Fix compilation after
	perf_counter_overflow change


* Metzger, Markus T <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:paulus@...ba.org]
> >Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM
> 
> 
> >Markus, please take care in future to mention it in the changelog if
> >your patches touch definitions used by other architectures.  If you
> >could go so far as to use grep a bit more and fix up other
> >architectures' callsites for the things you're changing, that would be
> >very much appreciated.  Thanks.
> 
> I'm sorry I missed that.
> 
> There's one more place in arch/sparc/.
> The below patch should fix it, but I have no means to test it.

You also missed a third thing:

+static inline int
+perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle, struct perf_counter *c,
+                 unsigned int size, int nmi, int sample)               { }

an 'int' function returning void ...

Plus all the !PERF_COUNTERS branch of empty inlines is pointless - these 
facilities are used by perfcounters code only. I fixed that too.

> 
> Index: b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> @@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_ha
>  
>  	regs = args->regs;
>  
> -	data.regs = regs;
>  	data.addr = 0;
>  
>  	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
> @@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_ha
>  		if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
> +		if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs))
>  			sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx);
>  	}

Looks correct to me and i've also done a Sparc cross build with the fix 
in place and it builds fine besides the unrelated build error pasted 
below. I've added it to the other fix and if David acks it will send it 
to Linus later today.

Thanks,

	Ingo

/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c: In function 'vgacon_startup':
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:516: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:517: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:518: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:519: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:520: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:520: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:521: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:522: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:525: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:526: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:527: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:527: warning: passing argument 1 of 'scr_readw' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:528: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:529: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:532: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:533: warning: passing argument 2 of 'scr_writew' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c: In function 'vgacon_do_font_op':
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:1126: error: implicit declaration of function 'vga_writeb'
/home/mingo/tip/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:1129: error: implicit declaration of function 'vga_readb'
make[4]: *** [drivers/video/console/vgacon.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/video/console] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/video] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/