| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-979f693def9084a452846365dfde5dcb28366333@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:34:02 GMT
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/printk] ratelimit: Use per ratelimit context locking
Commit-ID: 979f693def9084a452846365dfde5dcb28366333
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/979f693def9084a452846365dfde5dcb28366333
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
AuthorDate: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:44:11 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:31:34 +0200
ratelimit: Use per ratelimit context locking
I'd like to use printk_ratelimit() in atomic context, but that's
not possible right now due to the spinlock usage this commit
introduced more than a year ago:
717115e: printk ratelimiting rewrite
As a first step push the lock into the ratelimit state structure.
This allows us to deal with locking failures to be considered as an
event related to that state being too busy.
Also clean up the code a bit (without changing functionality):
- tidy up the definitions
- clean up the code flow
This also shrinks the code a tiny bit:
text data bss dec hex filename
264 0 4 268 10c ratelimit.o.before
255 0 0 255 ff ratelimit.o.after
( Whole-kernel data size got a bit larger, because we have
two ratelimit-state data structures right now. )
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/linux/ratelimit.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
lib/ratelimit.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ratelimit.h b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
index 00044b8..187bc16 100644
--- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
+++ b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
@@ -1,20 +1,30 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_RATELIMIT_H
#define _LINUX_RATELIMIT_H
+
#include <linux/param.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
-#define DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL (5 * HZ)
-#define DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST 10
+#define DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL (5 * HZ)
+#define DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST 10
struct ratelimit_state {
- int interval;
- int burst;
- int printed;
- int missed;
- unsigned long begin;
+ spinlock_t lock; /* protect the state */
+
+ int interval;
+ int burst;
+ int printed;
+ int missed;
+ unsigned long begin;
};
-#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval, burst) \
- struct ratelimit_state name = {interval, burst,}
+#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval_init, burst_init) \
+ \
+ struct ratelimit_state name = { \
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
+ .interval = interval_init, \
+ .burst = burst_init, \
+ }
extern int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs);
-#endif
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_RATELIMIT_H */
diff --git a/lib/ratelimit.c b/lib/ratelimit.c
index 26187ed..0e2c28e 100644
--- a/lib/ratelimit.c
+++ b/lib/ratelimit.c
@@ -7,15 +7,12 @@
* parameter. Now every user can use their own standalone ratelimit_state.
*
* This file is released under the GPLv2.
- *
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ratelimit_lock);
-
/*
* __ratelimit - rate limiting
* @rs: ratelimit_state data
@@ -26,11 +23,12 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ratelimit_lock);
int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
if (!rs->interval)
return 1;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ratelimit_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags);
if (!rs->begin)
rs->begin = jiffies;
@@ -38,20 +36,19 @@ int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs)
if (rs->missed)
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: %d callbacks suppressed\n",
__func__, rs->missed);
- rs->begin = 0;
+ rs->begin = 0;
rs->printed = 0;
- rs->missed = 0;
+ rs->missed = 0;
}
- if (rs->burst && rs->burst > rs->printed)
- goto print;
-
- rs->missed++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ratelimit_lock, flags);
- return 0;
+ if (rs->burst && rs->burst > rs->printed) {
+ rs->printed++;
+ ret = 1;
+ } else {
+ rs->missed++;
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rs->lock, flags);
-print:
- rs->printed++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ratelimit_lock, flags);
- return 1;
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ratelimit);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists