linux-kernel - [tip:core/printk] ratelimit: Fix/allow use in atomic contexts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-edaac8e3167501cda336231d00611bf59c164346@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:34:16 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/printk] ratelimit: Fix/allow use in atomic contexts

Commit-ID:  edaac8e3167501cda336231d00611bf59c164346
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/edaac8e3167501cda336231d00611bf59c164346
Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
AuthorDate: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:44:11 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:05:48 +0200

ratelimit: Fix/allow use in atomic contexts

I'd like to use printk_ratelimit() in NMI context, but it's not
robust right now due to spinlock usage in lib/ratelimit.c. If an
NMI is unlucky enough to hit just that spot we might lock up trying
to take the spinlock again.

Fix that by using a trylock variant. If we contend on that lock we
can genuinely skip the message because the state is just being
accessed by another CPU (or by this CPU).

( We could use atomics for the suppressed messages field, but
  i doubt it matters in practice and it makes the code heavier. )

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

---
 lib/ratelimit.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ratelimit.c b/lib/ratelimit.c
index 0e2c28e..69bfcac 100644
--- a/lib/ratelimit.c
+++ b/lib/ratelimit.c
@@ -28,7 +28,15 @@ int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs)
 	if (!rs->interval)
 		return 1;

-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags);
+	/*
+	 * If we contend on this state's lock then almost
+	 * by definition we are too busy to print a message,
+	 * in addition to the one that will be printed by
+	 * the entity that is holding the lock already:
+	 */
+	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags))
+		return 1;
+
 	if (!rs->begin)
 		rs->begin = jiffies;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/