[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB9DCC8.5050603@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:31:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [perf] Finding uninstalled modules Was Re: mailing list for trace
users
On 09/22/2009 11:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> $ perf annotate -v -v -k ~avi/kvm/linux-2.6/vmlinux -m vmx_vcpu_run |
>>
> Here is the problem, he is passing a vmlinux, that way we don't parse
> /proc/kallsyms, so no module symbols, he uses -m to load the modules
> symbols but mod_dso__load_module_paths only looks at /lib/modules/, i.e.
> installed modules.
>
> I guess Avi hasn't installed modules, right? So the right fix for this
> case is to figure out where modules are from the path given to -k, i.e.
> we first use ~avi/kvm/linux-2.6/ as the modules path prefix and then
> fallback to /lib/modules if we can't find modules there, right?
>
Modules were installed (I always load them with modprobe). It's
possible that the installed modules were a later version than the loaded
modules, but Mike's reply leads me to believe there was a real bug there.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists