[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19129.63017.997311.767124@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:19:21 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] kbuild: remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
Amerigo Wang writes:
>
> I got lots of "ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code" warnings
> during compile today's kernel.
>
> I think we can remove the gcc option '-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
> now, since we already have C99 for 10 years. :)
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 433493a..038bda2 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -559,9 +559,6 @@ endif
> NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> CHECKFLAGS += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)
>
> -# warn about C99 declaration after statement
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wdeclaration-after-statement,)
> -
> # disable pointer signed / unsigned warnings in gcc 4.0
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wno-pointer-sign,)
This is more a matter of coding-style policy than C technicalities.
I happen to hate declarations at random places in the code, so I'd
prefer the offending code to be fixed instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists