linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABA3ACF.50106@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:12:15 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
	michael@...dence.eu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
	Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class

On 09/23/2009 06:08 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
>> Not true, you want to address the major issues first.  What's the point
>> of fixing whitespace if the whole approach is rejected? if it has to
>> undergo a rewrite? (not an opinion on EDF btw, just as an example)
>>      
> I'm not sure why your fixated on whitespace , but thinking about it more
> I don't think it matters .. If you fix whitespace or major issues first,
> it doesn't matter .. All the issues have to eventually get fixed .. Not
> to mentioned that LKML is not something you could remotely control in
> that way.
>    

A technical issue is that if you rewrite the code the whitespace fix 
becomes irrelevant.  But more important is that it's a distraction when 
people are thinking about requirements and design.

>>> In this case the author is not totally aware of how to submit this
>>> code.. I don't think it's at all inappropriate to comment on that. His
>>> next submission will likely be much cleaner and nicer. It may even speed
>>> up the inclusion process since he'll be more easily able to submit the
>>> code (with practice and comments from us).
>>>
>>>        
>> Give people some credit.
>>      
> What do you mean?
>
>    

If he's able to write a scheduling class, he'll pick up the coding style 
when it becomes relevant.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/