[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090923031115.GB26530@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:11:15 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"richard@....demon.co.uk" <richard@....demon.co.uk>,
"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: regression in page writeback
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:56:05AM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:49:58 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > > After the sleep we repoll all queues.
> >
> > I mean, it is not always necessary. Only when _all_ superblocks cannot
> > writeback their inodes (eg. all in congestion), we should wait.
>
> Well. The code will still submit MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES pages to _some_
> queue in that situation.
>
> But yup, maybe that's a bug! Sounds easy to fix. It doesn't justify
> rewriting the whole world and then saying "look, the new code is faster
> than the old code which had a bug which I knew about but didn't fix".
I didn't submit the patches to avoid conflicts with Jens' work.
Sorry for doing that - that's not good attitude towards bug fixes..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists