[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251225150.7496@sister.anvils>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:36:15 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > Does TuxOnIce rely on CONFIG_MMU? If so, then the TuxOnIce patch
> > could presumably reuse VM_MAPPED_COPY for now - but don't be
> > surprised if that's one we clean away later on.
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure. The requirements are the same as for swsusp and
> uswsusp. Is there some tool to graph config dependencies?
If its requirements are the same as theirs, then I think yes,
TuxOnIce relies on config MMU: because config HIBERNATION depends
on SWAP (kernel/power/Kconfig) and config SWAP depends on MMU
(init/Kconfig).
But I hesitated to assume that, because in the TuxOnIce patch I have
here for reference (e.g. when deciding it'll cause you unwelcome hassle
if I move swap_info_struct from swap.h to swapfile.c!), it looked as if
you support saving to an ordinary file, not just to a swap file?
> Is there some tool to graph config dependencies?
I don't know it, but would be nice, and maybe it does exist.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists