[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ABCADCB.1080801@crca.org.au>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:47:23 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.
Hi.
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> Does TuxOnIce rely on CONFIG_MMU? If so, then the TuxOnIce patch
>>> could presumably reuse VM_MAPPED_COPY for now - but don't be
>>> surprised if that's one we clean away later on.
>> Hmm. I'm not sure. The requirements are the same as for swsusp and
>> uswsusp. Is there some tool to graph config dependencies?
>
> If its requirements are the same as theirs, then I think yes,
> TuxOnIce relies on config MMU: because config HIBERNATION depends
> on SWAP (kernel/power/Kconfig) and config SWAP depends on MMU
> (init/Kconfig).
>
> But I hesitated to assume that, because in the TuxOnIce patch I have
> here for reference (e.g. when deciding it'll cause you unwelcome hassle
> if I move swap_info_struct from swap.h to swapfile.c!), it looked as if
> you support saving to an ordinary file, not just to a swap file?
Yes, that's right.
>> Is there some tool to graph config dependencies?
>
> I don't know it, but would be nice, and maybe it does exist.
Okee doke.
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists