[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090925120830.c010bc71.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:08:30 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu: Correct is_vmamloc_or_module_addr() definition.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:06 +0900
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> Commit 81ac3ad9061dd9cd490ee92f0c5316a14d77ce18 broke the nommu build
> due to is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() not being marked inline. Fix it up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
Ah, sorry. I think Andrew queues the same patch.
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
>
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index b6eae5e..23e7fd6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static inline int is_vmalloc_addr(const void *x)
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> extern int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x);
> #else
> -static int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> +static inline int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists