[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090925031234.GF12099@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:12:34 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu: Correct is_vmamloc_or_module_addr() definition.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:08:30PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:06 +0900
> Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
>
> > Commit 81ac3ad9061dd9cd490ee92f0c5316a14d77ce18 broke the nommu build
> > due to is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() not being marked inline. Fix it up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> Ah, sorry. I think Andrew queues the same patch.
>
Ah, I'm too slow, David already caught it:
commit 934831d060ccd5471ecbc562804a8d3ccd6e562c
Author: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Thu Sep 24 12:33:32 2009 +0100
NOMMU: Fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be inline
The NOMMU fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be static inline,
not just static, in linux/mm.h.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Sorry for the noise!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists