lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <h9mbk1$b36$1@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:28:49 +0000 (UTC) From: daw@...berkeley.edu (David Wagner) To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Privilege dropping security module Andy Spencer wrote: >What would you suggest as a better specification language? Would it be >sufficient to have recursive and non recursive variants for masking >permissions? I haven't given it enough thought to recommend a better specification language. Having both recursive and non-recursive variants might do the trick. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/