[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090927012716.GB10173@crane-desktop>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:27:16 +0800
From: Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
Hi Bjorn,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:11:43PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 12:15 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Len,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c: In function 'acpi_smbus_cmi_add':
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c:374: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_device_uid'
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c:374: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 5 has type 'int'
> >
> > Caused by commit 6622d8cee73a26bce958484065c8f0e704911a62 ("ACPI: remove
> > acpi_device_uid() and related stuff") interacting with commit
> > dc9854212e0d7318d7133697906d98b78f3088b6 ("i2c: Add driver for SMBus
> > Control Method Interface") recently added to Linus' tree.
> >
> > I have used the version of the acpi tree from next-20090925 for today.
>
> I think we should use the following patch to remove the usage of
> acpi_device_uid(). Crane, do you agree, or is there some special
> reason you need it here?
I agree.
>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
- Crane
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists