linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.31.1 BUG #include <asm/bitsperlong.h>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABFA27F.1080100@upmc.fr>
Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:35:59 +0200
From:	Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...c.fr>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31.1 BUG #include <asm/bitsperlong.h>

Here is the difference that made my system crazy :

--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.30.6/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h	2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.31/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h	2009-09-27 11:27:02.577804468 +0200
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
 #define _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
 
+#include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
+
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 /*
  * __xx is ok: it doesn't pollute the POSIX namespace. Use these in the

So, where are supposed to be the export routines that did not work ?

Bernard


> The correct fix is to include the missing bitsperlong in
> the asm-x86 directory.
> In other words your kernel headers are broken.
> 
> Looking at latest kernel we do export bitsperlong.h.
> So see if you can find a fix for your broken kernel headers.
> 
> 	Sam


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/