linux-kernel - Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:32:46 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: No more bits in vm_area_struct's vm_flags.

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:22:08 +1000
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Seems good to me.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> > But
> >> +	if (vma->vm_hints)
> >> +		return 0;
> >>  	return 1;
> > 
> > Maybe adding a comment (or more detailed patch description) is necessary.
> 
> Thinking about this some more, I think we should also be looking at whether the new hints are non zero. Perhaps I should just add the new value to the
> function parameters and be done with it.
> 
No objections from me. plz do.
I said option (1) just because patch size will be big to unexpected.
Thank you for your effort.

Regards,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/