[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC1C59F.6010703@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:23 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2: kvm 4/4] Fix hotplug of CPUs for KVM.
On 09/29/2009 06:04 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Both VMX and SVM require per-cpu memory allocation, which is done at module
> init time, for only online cpus.
>
> Backend was not allocating enough structure for all possible CPUs, so
> new CPUs coming online could not be hardware enabled.
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index e27b7a9..2cd8bc2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1716,9 +1716,6 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val,
> {
> int cpu = (long)v;
>
> - if (!kvm_usage_count)
> - return NOTIFY_OK;
> -
> val&= ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN;
> switch (val) {
> case CPU_DYING:
>
I still don't see how this bit can work. Maybe if we move the
notification registration to the point where kvm_usage_count is bumped.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists