[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC22D00.5010406@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:51:28 -1000
From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2: kvm 4/4] Fix hotplug of CPUs for KVM.
On 09/28/2009 10:30 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 06:04 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> Both VMX and SVM require per-cpu memory allocation, which is done at
>> module
>> init time, for only online cpus.
>>
>> Backend was not allocating enough structure for all possible CPUs, so
>> new CPUs coming online could not be hardware enabled.
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index e27b7a9..2cd8bc2 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -1716,9 +1716,6 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct
>> notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val,
>> {
>> int cpu = (long)v;
>>
>> - if (!kvm_usage_count)
>> - return NOTIFY_OK;
>> -
>> val&= ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN;
>> switch (val) {
>> case CPU_DYING:
>
> I still don't see how this bit can work. Maybe if we move the
> notification registration to the point where kvm_usage_count is bumped.
That was stray junk in the patch. Let me rediff...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists