[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091002133954.GA29390@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:39:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC: carve out AMD MCE decoding logic
* Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com> wrote:
> +static void (*orig_mce_callback)(struct mce *m);
>
> void amd_report_gart_errors(bool v)
> {
> @@ -427,9 +428,25 @@ static int __init mce_amd_init(void)
> * We can decode MCEs for Opteron and later CPUs:
> */
> if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) &&
> - (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0xf))
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0xf)) {
> + /* safe the default decode mce callback */
> + orig_mce_callback = x86_mce_decode_callback;
> +
> x86_mce_decode_callback = amd_decode_mce;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> early_initcall(mce_amd_init);
> +
> +#ifdef MODULE
> +static void __exit mce_amd_exit(void)
> +{
> + x86_mce_decode_callback = orig_mce_callback;
> +}
I suspect this is fine currently because no two EDAC modules should be
active at the same time. A followup cleanup patch would be nice
nevertheless that uses a notifier chain here with proper
register/unregister locking.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists