linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #14270] Cannot boot on a PIII Celeron

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091004124320.GA6781@lenovo>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:43:20 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14270] Cannot boot on a PIII Celeron

[Michael Tokarev - Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 04:14:44PM +0400]
...
>>
>> I switched to BZIP2, it booted fine.  I switched back to LZMA -
>> and that one now boots too.  Original bzImage, which were built
>> by the same compiler from the same source using the same
>> options reboots.
>>
>> So um... I'm now trying to reproduce it ;)
>
> I performed about 20 kernel recompiles, and finally have some "statistics".
> The problem is almost reproduceable, in a sense that I was able to get 6
> more cases behaving the same way (rebooting right at early boot on a cel).
> And all 3 "non-working" cases were with ccache.  Ie, about half out of ~25
> compiles done with ccache, and 7 of the resulting kernels are buggy.  No
> single failure without ccache so far.
>
> Maybe it's some stale .o file cached by ccache (and it indeed looks like
> that) -- I didn't try to remove the cache yet (but my guess is that I
> wont be able to reproduce the issue with clean cache anymore).
>
> What puzzles me most is the "failure mode".  The difference between the
> two processors is minimal.  Having a corrupt .o file and almost-working
> kernel is almost impossible by its own.  And hitting this difference with
> a corrupt .o file is.. unbelievable.
>
> So I'm declaring it's a false alarm for now, and closing the bug.

ok, thanks for hard work on this Michael!

>
> /mjt
>
	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/