linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ACA2730.7000006@davidnewall.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:34:48 +1030
From:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To:	"Jayson R. King" <dev@...sonking.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27

Jayson R. King wrote:
> David Newall wrote:
>   
>> Shouldn't patches be sent as attachments?
>>     
>
> Not according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches

Yes, I was trying for irony.  Mime has been around for many decades and
anybody claiming that they can't cope with them is probably very stupid
or lying to make some strange point.  Anyway, I'm not trying to change
the policy, but was only have a snide dig, en passant, at the crufty,
old, has-been attitude that it represents.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/