lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:09:03 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Pete <greg.petr@...il.com>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: added KERNEL-DEBUG flag to printk statments

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0530, Pete wrote:
> The following is a trivial patch which adds some KRENEL_DEBUG flags to
> the printk. This is my first patch, please review the same.

Did you compile it?  I don't find the string KERNEL_DEBUG anywhere in
my kernel.

More generally, if you're going to change these lines at all, it would
be better to convert them to use pr_debug instead of their own custom
debug printer.

Pay special attention to getting DEBUG set in the right place, and
_at least_ compile-test your code, with and without DEBUG enabled.
You should really run your code (again, with and without DEBUG enabled)
and check that it does the right thing.

> 
> --- linux-2.6/fs/aio.c	2009-10-05 14:46:11.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.test/fs/aio.c	2009-10-05 19:46:11.000000000 +0530
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int aio_setup_ring(struct kioctx
>  	}
>  
>  	info->mmap_size = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> -	dprintk("attempting mmap of %lu bytes\n", info->mmap_size);
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "attempting mmap of %lu bytes\n",
> info->mmap_size);
>  	down_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
>  	info->mmap_base = do_mmap(NULL, 0, info->mmap_size, 
>  				  PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE,
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int aio_setup_ring(struct kioctx
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  	}
>  
> -	dprintk("mmap address: 0x%08lx\n", info->mmap_base);
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "mmap address: 0x%08lx\n", info->mmap_base);
>  	info->nr_pages = get_user_pages(current, ctx->mm,
>  					info->mmap_base, nr_pages, 
>  					1, 0, info->ring_pages, NULL);
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsign
>  	hlist_add_head_rcu(&ctx->list, &mm->ioctx_list);
>  	spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
>  
> -	dprintk("aio: allocated ioctx %p[%ld]: mm=%p mask=0x%x\n",
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio: allocated ioctx %p[%ld]: mm=%p mask=0x%x
> \n",
>  		ctx, ctx->user_id, current->mm, ctx->ring_info.nr);
>  	return ctx;
>  
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ out_freectx:
>  	kmem_cache_free(kioctx_cachep, ctx);
>  	ctx = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	dprintk("aio: error allocating ioctx %p\n", ctx);
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio: error allocating ioctx %p\n", ctx);
>  	return ctx;
>  }
>  
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		cancel_work_sync(&ctx->wq.work);
>  
>  		if (1 != atomic_read(&ctx->users))
> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG,
>  				"exit_aio:ioctx still alive: %d %d %d\n",
>  				atomic_read(&ctx->users), ctx->dead,
>  				ctx->reqs_active);
> @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ int aio_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, lon
>  	event->res = res;
>  	event->res2 = res2;
>  
> -	dprintk("aio_complete: %p[%lu]: %p: %p %Lx %lx %lx\n",
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio_complete: %p[%lu]: %p: %p %Lx %lx %lx\n",
>  		ctx, tail, iocb, iocb->ki_obj.user, iocb->ki_user_data,
>  		res, res2);
>  
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static int aio_read_evt(struct kioctx *i
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	ring = kmap_atomic(info->ring_pages[0], KM_USER0);
> -	dprintk("in aio_read_evt h%lu t%lu m%lu\n",
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "in aio_read_evt h%lu t%lu m%lu\n",
>  		 (unsigned long)ring->head, (unsigned long)ring->tail,
>  		 (unsigned long)ring->nr);
>  
> @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static int aio_read_evt(struct kioctx *i
>  
>  out:
>  	kunmap_atomic(ring, KM_USER0);
> -	dprintk("leaving aio_read_evt: %d  h%lu t%lu\n", ret,
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "leaving aio_read_evt: %d  h%lu t%lu\n", ret,
>  		 (unsigned long)ring->head, (unsigned long)ring->tail);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1100,13 +1100,13 @@ retry:
>  		if (unlikely(ret <= 0))
>  			break;
>  
> -		dprintk("read event: %Lx %Lx %Lx %Lx\n",
> +		dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "read event: %Lx %Lx %Lx %Lx\n",
>  			ent.data, ent.obj, ent.res, ent.res2);
>  
>  		/* Could we split the check in two? */
>  		ret = -EFAULT;
>  		if (unlikely(copy_to_user(event, &ent, sizeof(ent)))) {
> -			dprintk("aio: lost an event due to EFAULT.\n");
> +			dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio: lost an event due to EFAULT.\n");
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		ret = 0;
> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ retry:
>  
>  		ret = -EFAULT;
>  		if (unlikely(copy_to_user(event, &ent, sizeof(ent)))) {
> -			dprintk("aio: lost an event due to EFAULT.\n");
> +			dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio: lost an event due to EFAULT.\n");
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static void io_destroy(struct kioctx *io
>  	hlist_del_rcu(&ioctx->list);
>  	spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
>  
> -	dprintk("aio_release(%p)\n", ioctx);
> +	dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "aio_release(%p)\n", ioctx);
>  	if (likely(!was_dead))
>  		put_ioctx(ioctx);	/* twice for the list */
>  
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static ssize_t aio_setup_iocb(struct kio
>  			kiocb->ki_retry = aio_fsync;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		dprintk("EINVAL: io_submit: no operation provided\n");
> +		dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "EINVAL: io_submit: no operation provided\n");
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static int io_submit_one(struct kioctx *
>  
>  	ret = put_user(req->ki_key, &user_iocb->aio_key);
>  	if (unlikely(ret)) {
> -		dprintk("EFAULT: aio_key\n");
> +		dprintk(KERNEL_DEBUG "EFAULT: aio_key\n");
>  		goto out_put_req;
>  	}
>  
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ