[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091005015756.GA2758@hack>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:57:56 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
marcin.slusarz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] extend get/setrlimit to support setting rlimits
external to a process (v4)
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:54:05PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>Add syscall infrastructure for getprlimit/setprlimit
>
>This patch adds the definitions for the get/setprlimit syscalls. They are
>identical to the get/setlimit calls, except that they allow the caller to
>manipulate limits for processes other than themselves.
>
>Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Hello, Neil.
What is your point of adding two new syscalls?
Why not add them to prctl(2)? :-)
Thanks.
>
>
> include/linux/syscalls.h | 4 ++
> kernel/sys.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>index 80de700..535210a 100644
>--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
>+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>@@ -584,11 +584,15 @@ asmlinkage long sys_newuname(struct new_utsname __user *name);
>
> asmlinkage long sys_getrlimit(unsigned int resource,
> struct rlimit __user *rlim);
>+asmlinkage long sys_getprlimit(pid_t pid, unsigned int resource,
>+ struct rlimit __user *rlim);
> #if defined(COMPAT_RLIM_OLD_INFINITY) || !(defined(CONFIG_IA64))
> asmlinkage long sys_old_getrlimit(unsigned int resource, struct rlimit __user *rlim);
> #endif
> asmlinkage long sys_setrlimit(unsigned int resource,
> struct rlimit __user *rlim);
>+asmlinkage long sys_setprlimit(pid_t pid, unsigned int resource,
>+ struct rlimit __user *rlim);
> asmlinkage long sys_getrusage(int who, struct rusage __user *ru);
> asmlinkage long sys_umask(int mask);
>
>diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
>index 05bd22a..4fe1140 100644
>--- a/kernel/sys.c
>+++ b/kernel/sys.c
>@@ -1211,6 +1211,50 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getrlimit, unsigned int, resource, struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
> }
> }
>
>+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(getprlimit, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, resource,
>+ struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
>+{
>+ unsigned long flags;
>+ struct task_struct *tsk;
>+ struct pid *ppid;
>+ int retval = -EINVAL;
>+
>+ ppid = find_get_pid(pid);
>+ if (!ppid)
>+ goto out;
>+
>+ tsk = get_pid_task(ppid, PIDTYPE_PID);
>+
>+ if (!tsk)
>+ goto out_put_pid;
>+
>+ if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
>+ goto out_put_all;
>+
>+ retval = -EBUSY;
>+ if (!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags))
>+ goto out_put_all;
>+
>+ else {
>+ struct rlimit val;
>+
>+ task_lock(tsk->group_leader);
>+ val = current->signal->rlim[resource];
>+ task_unlock(tsk->group_leader);
>+ retval = copy_to_user(rlim, &val, sizeof(*rlim)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>+ }
>+
>+ unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
>+
>+out_put_all:
>+ put_task_struct(tsk);
>+out_put_pid:
>+ put_pid(ppid);
>+out:
>+ return retval;
>+}
>+
>+
> #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_OLD_GETRLIMIT
>
> /*
>@@ -1301,6 +1345,46 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int, resource, struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
> return do_setrlimit(resource, &new_rlim, current);
> }
>
>+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(setprlimit, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, resource,
>+ struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
>+{
>+ struct task_struct *tsk;
>+ struct pid *ppid;
>+ unsigned long flags;
>+ struct rlimit new_rlim;
>+ int retval = -EINVAL;
>+
>+ ppid = find_get_pid(pid);
>+ if (!ppid)
>+ goto out;
>+
>+ tsk = get_pid_task(ppid, PIDTYPE_PID);
>+
>+ if (!tsk)
>+ goto out_put_pid;
>+
>+ if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
>+ goto out_put_all;
>+
>+ retval = -EFAULT;
>+ if (copy_from_user(&new_rlim, rlim, sizeof(*rlim)))
>+ goto out_put_all;
>+
>+ if (!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags))
>+ goto out_put_all;
>+
>+ retval = do_setrlimit(resource, &new_rlim, tsk);
>+
>+ unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
>+
>+out_put_all:
>+ put_task_struct(tsk);
>+out_put_pid:
>+ put_pid(ppid);
>+out:
>+ return retval;
>+}
>+
> /*
> * It would make sense to put struct rusage in the task_struct,
> * except that would make the task_struct be *really big*. After
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Live like a child, think like the god.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists