| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9987.1254813489@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:18:09 +0100 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@...l.gov>, Ben Woodard <bwoodard@...l.gov>, Stable Team <stable@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Patch v2] rwsem: fix rwsem_is_locked() bugs Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote: > Since if we have locks, we don't need memory barriers any more, right? Indeed - locks are implicit memory barriers. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists