[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006163521.GA10425@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:05:21 +0530
From: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power
management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and
introduce cpuidle to POWER.
* Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-10-06 20:54:21]:
> Hi
>
> Please consider this for inclusion into the testing tree.
>
> This patchset introduces cpuidle infrastructure to POWER, prototyping
> for pSeries, and also does a major refactoring of current x86 idle
> power management and a cleanup of cpuidle infrastructure.
>
> Earlier discussions on the same can be found at:
>
> v6 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/180
> v5 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/26
> v4 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/1/133
> v3 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/124
> v2 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233
> v1 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/19/150
>
>
> Changes in this version:
> -----------------------------------------
>
> * Earlier implementation maintained a list of cpuidle devices and
> the list was traversed to disable and enable the cpuidle devices
> when switching governors. This list is not necessary and is removed.
> Now, we get the per cpu structure cpuidle_devices and disable and
> enable it for each online cpu while switching governors.
>
> * Earlier iterations were buggy w.r.t the sysfs interface of the cpuidle.
> This iteration removes the bug in PATCH 1/7.
>
> * In PATCH 7/7, smt_snooze_delay was not being updated whenever it was
> changed through the sysfs interface. Provide a helper routine to
> update it.
>
> * In PATCH 7/7, the idle loops are renamed to denote the idle states
> to avoid any confusion.
>
Also, the per-cpu nature of registration/unregistration of cpuidle
has been maintained as ACPI needs this.
>
> thanks,
> arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists