[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1254852279.17055.2.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:04:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power
management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce
cpuidle to POWER.
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:05 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> Also, the per-cpu nature of registration/unregistration of cpuidle
> has been maintained as ACPI needs this.
Right, so can't we ditch that and have acpi default to the lowest common
C-state and warn when various cpus report different C-states?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists