[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091008.175553.139810708.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mb@...sch.de
Cc: linville@...driver.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-10-08
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:16:44 +0200
> And there's no reason to rush this fix into mainline.
I think it's worthwhile because people turn the DMA API debugger on
and it's going to spit out warnings that "don't matter" until you guys
fix this.
I looked at the patch you guys are so up in arms about, and frankly it
looks perfectly fine to me.
If you want to implement the fix "perfectly", and "to your standards",
then fine. But do it in net-next-2.6 as a follow-on patch to this
one.
I'm not undoing John's pull request just for this. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists