linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-10-08

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091008.180119.242402327.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mb@...sch.de
Cc:	linville@...driver.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-10-08

From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:08:06 +0200

> I was planning to do a better solution, but I didn't have the time, yet.

The change is harmless while we're twiddling our thumbs waiting
for you to implement the fix "properly."

Not having the fix in is a developer burdon because people turn
on the DMA API debugger and are going to keep reporting it's
complaints here and elsewhere.

Get over your Napoleon complex, and let reasonable working fixes
get into the tree even if you don't find them optimal.  You can
always improve them later, "when you get around to it."

People put fixes in without my ACK in my areas of expertiece all
the time.  I got over it a long time ago, it's OK, and not worth
stressing out over.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/