linux-kernel - Re: [Patch vs. percpu next] Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091011082427.GB14995@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:24:27 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch vs. percpu next] Use this_cpu_xx for ftrace


* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: tracing: Use this_cpu_xx for ftrace
> 
> this_cpu_xx can reduce the instruction count here and also
> avoid address arithmetic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

Thanks Christoph,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/