linux-kernel - Re: [Patch vs. percpu next] Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD30A7F.1080701@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:52:47 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch vs. percpu next] Use this_cpu_xx for ftrace

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: tracing: Use this_cpu_xx for ftrace
> 
> this_cpu_xx can reduce the instruction count here and also
> avoid address arithmetic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>

applied to percpu#for-next.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/