linux-kernel - Re: [Patch vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD30A6A.9000908@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:52:26 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Patch vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu_xx in nmi handling

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: Use this_cpu_xx in nmi handling
> 
> this_cpu_inc/dec reduces the number of instructions needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>

applied to percpu#for-next.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/