[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0910121124110.19284@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: iceberg <iceberg@...ras.ru>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] hidraw.c: double mutex_lock
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, iceberg wrote:
> KERNEL_VERSION: 2.6.31
> DESCRIBE:
> In driver ./drivers/hid/hidraw.c in function hidraw_read may be
> double mutex_lock:
>
> Path:
> 1. line 50: begin first iteration of "while(ret==0)"
> 2. line 52: first call to mutex_lock
> 3. inner loop "while (list->head == list->tail)" does not change state
> of mutex, because mutex_lock immediatelly follows mutex_unlock
> 4. if we go to the second iteration of "while(ret == 0)" in
> line 50 then there are second call to mutex_lock in line 52 (mutex
> aquired twice).
>
> Second iteration of loop "while(ret==0)" is possible if local variable
> ret is not changed at line 94: ret+=len - i.e. len==0;
> Variable len may be zero if hidraw_read is called with count==0 or
> list->buffer[list->tail].len == 0.
Good catch. I will fix that up by moving the mutex_lock() so that it's
locked before the loop is entered.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists