lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD2F62A.5010704@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:26:02 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v3] KVM: Nested SVM fixes and tracepoint conversion

On 10/09/2009 04:08 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Avi, Marcelo,
>
> this series of patches contains bugfixes for the Nested SVM code and the
> conversion of Nested SVM debugging to tracepoints. The fixes are:
>
> 	1) A patch Alex already sent (1/9) but which was not yet
> 	   applied. It fixes a lost event_inj problem when we emulate a
> 	   vmrun and a vmexit without entering the guest in the
> 	   meantime.
>
> 	2) The patch 2/9 fixes a schedule() while atomic bug in the
> 	   Nested SVM code. The KVM interrupt injection code runs with
> 	   preemtion and interrupts disabled. But the
> 	   enable_irq_window() function from SVM may emulate a #vmexit.
> 	   This emulation might sleep which causes the schedule() while
> 	   atomic() bug.
>
> These fixes (patches 1 and 2) should also be considered for -stable
> backporting.  The patches 3 to 8 convert the old printk based debugging
> for Nested SVM to tracepoints.  Patch 9 removes the nsvm_printk code.
> Please review and/or consider to apply these changes.
>    

Looks good to me.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ