[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD420A4.7050508@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:39:32 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	kurt.hackel@...cle.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation
On 10/12/2009 09:13 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/12/09 11:29, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>> Good catch.  Doesn't that invalidate rdtscp based vgettimeofday on
>> non-virt as well (assuming p == cpu)?
>>      
> The tsc clocksource assumes the tsc is (mostly?) synced; it doesn't use
> rdtscp or make any attempt at per-cpu corrections.
>    
So it's broken or disabled when that assumption is wrong?  We could 
easily fix that now.  Might even reuse the pvclock structures.
-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
