[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10910130000k20f53a4pfc3593db95c66138@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:18 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, zbr@...emap.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] connector: Passing required parameter for function
cn_add_callback.
On 10/13/09, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
>
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:27:49 +0600
>
>
> > On 10/12/09, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:44:33 +0600
> >>
> >>
> >> > */
> >> > -static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg)
> >> > +static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg, struct
> >> > netlink_skb_parms *nsp)
> >>
> >>
> >> Your patches are unusable because your email client corrupts the
> >> patch, here you can see it is splitting up long lines.
> >>
> >> Please fix this up and resubmit.
> > Oops..... sorry for that. This is the second time I'm facing this
> > problem. I'll try to fix it.
> > I'm resubmitting the patch. Here I've recreate the patch to split the
> > line into two.
> > And it just reaches its 80 line mark. Hopefully it will be okay.
>
>
> Upstream and my net-next-2.6 tree both have this function with
> the proper parameters, maybe Andrew's -mm tree had some conflicts
> and they weren't dealt with correctly.
>
Ah, sorry again. I should've check the upstream first. Sorry for noise.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists