[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013110407.GC31984@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:04:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32-rc2: runtime_pm is noisy
On Tue 2009-10-06 23:42:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Maybe it is my config,
>
> Yes it is.
>
> > but pm_runtime_idle is a bit too noisy on
> > zaurus... ok, I do have pm_debug & pm_verbose
>
> Exactly.
>
> > set... but still, is it useful to print message about devices that do not
> > support it?
>
> It may be useful, because, for example, PCI can put devices without drivers
> into low power states using this mechanism.
>
> Still, perhaps we can drop the debug messages from __pm_runtime_idle().
>
> Care to send a patch?
Yep, something like this?
---
pm_runtime_idle is somewhat noisy. Remove debug prints.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@ static int __pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
{
int retval = 0;
- dev_dbg(dev, "__pm_runtime_idle()!\n");
-
if (dev->power.runtime_error)
retval = -EINVAL;
else if (dev->power.idle_notification)
@@ -93,8 +91,6 @@ static int __pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
out:
- dev_dbg(dev, "__pm_runtime_idle() returns %d!\n", retval);
-
return retval;
}
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists