[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910282307.14838.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:07:14 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32-rc2: runtime_pm is noisy
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2009-10-06 23:42:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Maybe it is my config,
> >
> > Yes it is.
> >
> > > but pm_runtime_idle is a bit too noisy on
> > > zaurus... ok, I do have pm_debug & pm_verbose
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
> > > set... but still, is it useful to print message about devices that do not
> > > support it?
> >
> > It may be useful, because, for example, PCI can put devices without drivers
> > into low power states using this mechanism.
> >
> > Still, perhaps we can drop the debug messages from __pm_runtime_idle().
> >
> > Care to send a patch?
>
> Yep, something like this?
Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
>
> pm_runtime_idle is somewhat noisy. Remove debug prints.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,6 @@ static int __pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> {
> int retval = 0;
>
> - dev_dbg(dev, "__pm_runtime_idle()!\n");
> -
> if (dev->power.runtime_error)
> retval = -EINVAL;
> else if (dev->power.idle_notification)
> @@ -93,8 +91,6 @@ static int __pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
>
> out:
> - dev_dbg(dev, "__pm_runtime_idle() returns %d!\n", retval);
> -
> return retval;
> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists