| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <94a0d4530910130518r55031d91t55f519199d5a3b74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:18:15 +0300 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Weird ext4 bug: 256P used? On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 02:11:27PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> My compiler fails because this function is already defined at >> 'lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h' as non static. > > Ah, you must be using a 64-bit 'pu' branch version of e2fsprogs. > Yeah, this patch was meant for the 'maint' branch. A sightly > different branch is needed for the 'pu' branch. I just used the HEAD: remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master Anyway, it builds fine on the 'maint' branch :) Thanks a lot. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists