linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD4705D.6020109@openvz.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:19:41 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>, vatsa@...ibm.com,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2

> as I already stated, it seems perfectly fine for me 

You're not the only one interested in it, sorry. Besides, I
got your point in "I'm find with it". Now get mine which is
about "I am not".

> can be trivially mapped to the two values, by chosing a
> fixed multiplicative base (let's say '1s' to simplify :) 
> 
>   with 50%, you get 1s/0.5s
>   with 20%, you get 1s/0.2s
>   with  5%, you get 1s/0.05s
> 
> well, you get the idea :)

No I don't.
Is 1s/0.5s worse or better than 2s/1s?
How should I make a choice?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/