[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013122720.GA5561@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:27:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, paulus@...ba.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PERF] do not manually count string lengths
* Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > We should add 'F:' file patterns to that entry i guess ...
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > F: kernel/perf_event.c
> > F: include/linux/perf_event.h
> > F: arch/*/*/kernel/perf_event.c
> > F: arch/*/include/asm/perf_event.h
> > F: tools/perf/
> >
> > Would do the trick. Mind sending a patch for that too?
>
> Yep, I'll do, but a quick find in the tree may reveal other
> suspects that could be in the same league:
>
> $ find . -name .git -prune -false -o -name drivers -prune \
> -false -o -name '*perf*' | grep -v perfmon | grep -v gperf
>
> arch/*/kernel/perf_event.c
>
> arch/frv/lib/perf_event.c
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>
> or maybe not:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> arch/parisc/kernel/perf_asm.S
> arch/parisc/kernel/perf_images.h
> arch/parisc/kernel/perf.c
> arch/parisc/include/asm/perf.h
>
> Was your list really comprehensive ?
ah, yes - perf_callchain.c too indeed. The pattern does not have to be
100% full coverage.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists