[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4727185d0910130548p325f0185vf4e23b5491c730a0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:48:14 +0200
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, paulus@...ba.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PERF] do not manually count string lengths
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>> Was your list really comprehensive ?
>
> ah, yes - perf_callchain.c too indeed. The pattern does not have to be
> 100% full coverage.
How looks the attached ?
--
Vincent Legoll
View attachment "0001-Update-performance-events-subsystem-maintainers-entr.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (971 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists