[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255494109.1851.7.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:21:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add a never optimized away pr_dbg for
printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt)...)
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 20:34 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many developers use a logging message that
> > is printed at KERN_DEBUG level that is always
> > printed regardless of #define DEBUG levels.
> > pr_debug can be optimized away to a null statement.
> > Add a pr_dbg message that prints at KERN_DEBUG
> > level that uses pr_fmt() that can not be optimized
> > to nothing.
> pr_dbg() is horribly misnamed, it doesn't indicate why it exists vs.
> pr_debug() at all.
Partially true, it's reasonably named because it's very short.
> Future users will undoubtedly use it by mistake when
> they only really mean for the message to be emitted on DEBUG because
> they've seen it in other places and haven't checked the implementation.
The cost of using pr_dbg instead of pr_debug isn't high.
The primary benefit is getting an automatic pr_fmt
and shorter code.
> I'd suggest pr_debug_force(), even though it's much longer (although still
> shorter than printk(KERN_DEBUG)).
pr_dbg allows longer format strings without exceeding 80 chars.
printk(KERN_DEBUG
pr_debug_force
pr_dbg_always
pr_dbg_noopt
Other suggestions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists