linux-kernel - Re: removing existing working drivers via staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD74ED7.9070501@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:33:27 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	david@...g.hm
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: removing existing working drivers via staging

david@...g.hm wrote:
> I missed this discussion in the thread "Moving drivers into 
> staging (was Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 2.6.32-" and I suspect that 
> many others did as well
> 
> for those that missed it, as I understand it the proposal is that 'ugly' 
> (working drivers that don't do things the kernel way and are perceived as 
> not being commonly used anymore) drivers will get moved into staging, and

There was mention of "abandoned and unused" drivers (rather than "not
/commonly/ used anymore"), see e.g.
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-10/msg05204.html
(2nd to last paragraph; thread continues with Greg's follow-up).

> if the driver maintainers do not clean them up within 6-9 months they will 
> be removed entirely.
> 
> the expectation is that if there are no maintainers for the driver who 
> care enough to do the cleanup they should be removed (with interested 
> users being able to take over maintaining the drivers if there the 
> maintainers are MIA)
> 
> I have several reactions to this
> 
> I think that 6-9 months (2-3 releases) is _far_ too short for users to 
> notice. most users will be using a distro kernel that is on a release 
> cycle longer than this (even if they are not using a 'enterprise' distro), 
> so their first inkling of a problem will be the driver disappearing on 
> them. Yes the driver can be recovered through git, bit at that point 
> there is going to be catch-up changes to make.
> 
> What happened to the desire that Linux would be able to use anything, and 
> once a driver was upstream changes to the kernel that would break it 
> should be fixed by whoever is introducing those changes? This seems to be 
> moving in the direction of only having drivers for fairly current, fairly 
> common hardware.

AFAIU, mostly just code which is known to _not work_ anymore or has been
functionally replaced by an alternative drops out of the mainline.  This
idea of using drivers/staging/ in the process is surely not going to
change that in principle; it will only raise awareness among active
kernel developers better than feature-removal-schedule.txt can do.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =-=- -====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/