[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910142213590.22169@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: removing existing working drivers via staging
I missed this discussion in the thread "Moving drivers into
staging (was Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 2.6.32-" and I suspect that
many others did as well
for those that missed it, as I understand it the proposal is that 'ugly'
(working drivers that don't do things the kernel way and are perceived as
not being commonly used anymore) drivers will get moved into staging, and
if the driver maintainers do not clean them up within 6-9 months they will
be removed entirely.
the expectation is that if there are no maintainers for the driver who
care enough to do the cleanup they should be removed (with interested
users being able to take over maintaining the drivers if there the
maintainers are MIA)
I have several reactions to this
I think that 6-9 months (2-3 releases) is _far_ too short for users to
notice. most users will be using a distro kernel that is on a release
cycle longer than this (even if they are not using a 'enterprise' distro),
so their first inkling of a problem will be the driver disappearing on
them. Yes the driver can be recovered through git, bit at that point
there is going to be catch-up changes to make.
What happened to the desire that Linux would be able to use anything, and
once a driver was upstream changes to the kernel that would break it
should be fixed by whoever is introducing those changes? This seems to be
moving in the direction of only having drivers for fairly current, fairly
common hardware.
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists