[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910152126.28024.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:26:27 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvc_console: returning 0 from put_chars is not an error
Am Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009 20:57:45 schrieb Scott Wood:
> Doing it in the backend requires the backend to know whether it's being
> called for printk or for user I/O. In the latter case, we don't want to
> spin, but rather wait for an IRQ (or poll with a timer if there's no IRQ).
Right. Now you have me convinced that we really should have some logic in
hvc_console because, its the only place that knows if it came from printk or
user.
About the backends, there are some that spin until the text is delivered (e.g.
virtio) , others can drop (e.g. iucv is a connection oriented protocol and it
will (and has to) drop if there is no connection).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists