[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091015192757.GA11271@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:27:57 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: linker script syntax nits
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:26:16AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > The other -- and somewhat less cantankerous way -- is to use a dummy symbol:
> >
> > #define LINUX_ASSERT(expr, name, string) name = ASSERT(expr, string)
> >
> > "name" would have to be unique for each instance.
>
> I wouldn't like to pollute the symtabs with those useless symbols.
>
> #define LINUX_ASSERT(expr, string) PROVIDE(_assert_bogon = ASSERT(expr, string))
>
> works with a recent ld. I don't know what the problematic old ld versions
> were. Do you have such on hand to test?
Jean reported binutils 2.14.90.0.6.
See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=124930110427870&w=2
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists