[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADAD070.5080002@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:23:12 +0900
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL RFC] pvclock cleanups and pvclock vsyscall support
On 10/18/2009 05:18 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/18/09 15:43, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 10/16/2009 04:46 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Care to cook up a patch to implement the kvm bits to make sure it all
>>> works OK for you?
>>>
>>>
>> I've started to do that, but it occurs to me that we're missing out on
>> NUMA placement by forcing all clocks to be on the same page. OTOH, if
>> the clocks are heavily used, they'll stay in cache, and if not, who
>> cares.
>>
> Yes, I'd say so. I'd expect the data to be very close to read-only, so
> the lines should be shared pretty efficiently.
>
>
There wouldn't be any sharing since each clock is on its own cache
line. But the point is valid regardless.
> On the other hand, there's nothing to stop us from moving to multiple
> pages in future (either to support NUMA placement, or just more than 64
> cpus).
>
I'm already allocating multiple pages, so we'd just need to adjust the
fixmap.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists