[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADAD561.9060901@goop.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:44:17 +0900
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL RFC] pvclock cleanups and pvclock vsyscall support
On 10/18/09 17:23, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On the other hand, there's nothing to stop us from moving to multiple
>> pages in future (either to support NUMA placement, or just more than 64
>> cpus).
>>
>
> I'm already allocating multiple pages, so we'd just need to adjust the
> fixmap.
Are you changing pvclock_init_vsyscall() to allocate more pages? More
fixmap slots should be no problem.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists