[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091017164042.GC1423@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:40:42 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>,
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Boyan <btanastasov@...oo.co.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>,
"Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier" <fredlwm@...il.com>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
Hi!
> Comments? Does this work? Does it make any difference? It seems fairly
> unlikely, but it's the only obvious problem I've seen in the tty buffering
> code so far.
>
> And that code is literally 3 years old, and it seems unlikely that a
> regular _keyboard_ buffer would be able to hit the (rather small) race
> condition. But other serialization may have hidden it, and timing
> differences could certainly have caused it to trigger much more easily.
I use this (run as root) to trigger various problems in this
area... (portable between i386 and i386).
Pavel
void
main(void)
{
int i;
iopl(3);
while (1) {
asm volatile("cli");
// for (i=0; i<20000000; i++)
for (i=0; i<1000000000; i++)
asm volatile("");
asm volatile("sti");
sleep(1);
}
}
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists